Did AirAsia just flip a flight fiasco into a brand win?

Social media has been abuzz over the past week after AirAsia posted a series of TikTok videos showing its staff speaking Mandarin.

The first video, posted on 23 April, showed staff using Mandarin to deliver standard travel reminders such as arrival times for international and domestic flights.

The second video, released a day later, leaned further into humour. Captioned: “Any working adults keen to learn Mandarin online? We’re thinking of learning too,” it featured a pilot and crew members playfully demonstrating Mandarin phrases, including “check-in”, the airline’s achievements, and its route network scale, before ending with an invitation for viewers to vote on whose Mandarin was the most fluent.

So what prompted AirAsia to make this move? The airline appears to have been building on the momentum of a viral video that surfaced on 22 April, depicting a passenger incident aboard an AirAsia flight to Chongqing, China.

Don't miss: PR has mastered getting seen, but is it any closer to being understood?

The incident began after a woman was allegedly unhappy at being told to lower her voice while speaking on the phone before take-off. When cabin crew intervened, she demanded to be addressed in Mandarin instead of English and criticised the staff for not being able to speak Mandarin on an international flight.

The confrontation resulted in a short delay of around 30 minutes but quickly escalated online as videos of the exchange circulated widely across social platforms, triggering intense public debate.

According to sentiment tracking by Dataxet Malaysia, overall sentiment towards the incident was largely mixed, with positive sentiment at 50%, negative at 40%, and neutral at 10%. While opinions were divided, much of the online conversation centred on AirAsia’s response rather than the incident itself.

Many comments applauded the airline for its witty videos featuring ground staff, pilots and cabin crew speaking in Mandarin. Netizens called it a “power response” and “correct attitude”, believing that AirAsia successfully turned a potential crisis into days of free positive advertising.

Industry professionals that A+M spoke to, said the response had largely reframed the conversation.

“It’s definitely a win. The execution was smart. They responded quickly and used the right channel with the right tone,” said Julia Taslim, co-founder of Commas PR. She added that AirAsia successfully turned passive viewers into active participants by inviting audiences to engage directly with the content.

However, she noted a missed opportunity: “I wish they’d been more explicit in showing support for the crew member at the centre of this."

There was a real opportunity to clearly say: we’ve got our people’s backs.

From a strategy standpoint, she said the key distinction was intent. “There’s a big difference between responding and reacting. AirAsia responded. They shifted the conversation toward personality, warmth and self-awareness rather than getting pulled into the drama.”

For others, the move was deeply aligned with brand identity. Diyana Anuar, marketing director at UNITAR Education Group, described the response as emotionally intelligent.

"AirAsia has always been slightly cheeky and unafraid to play in moments where most brands would avoid. Instead of going quiet, they showed up in culture. And people got it. It felt human and reinforced the empathy already there for the crew," said Diyana.

“Some will say this does not solve the issue, but that kind of misses the point. AirAsia wasn’t trying to win the argument. They were winning the moment,” she added.

She also pointed to a broader lesson for marketers:

We don’t always need to control the narrative. Sometimes we just need to participate in it.

Echoing a similar view, Eugenie Chan, managing director at Access Comms Malaysia and co-founder of Suppagood, said the airline’s approach demonstrated modern crisis communication in action.

She added that the brand “moved at the speed of culture, not corporate”, reframing conflict into capability through content rather than formal commentary.

Silence is no longer neutral. In a networked environment, if you don’t shape the narrative, someone else will.

Chan added, “What they did well was to engage without inflaming. They didn’t argue, they demonstrated.” She explained that AirAsia had injected just the right amount of lightness to diffuse tension, and that's a difficult balance to strike. 

"In this case, it didn’t just manage sentiment, it actively converted attention into brand visibility and affinity, showing how modern PR moments are won in the feed, spilling out seamlessly into the newsroom," she said.

Taslim echoed Chan's thoughts about silence not being an option, especially after something hits a million views. "There's a big difference between responding and reacting. In this case, AirAsia responded. But not every brand can pull this off. It only works when the tone fits who you are."

Dataxet’s breakdown supports this shift in perception, with the dominant theme in conversation being AirAsia’s “clever response” (45%), followed by criticism of the passenger involved (25%) and debate around language expectations onboard (20%). Only a small minority (10%) viewed the airline’s response as opportunistic.

Taken together, the incident highlighted how rapidly crisis moments can be reframed in a social-first environment, where response speed, tone and cultural fluency can determine whether brands lose control of the narrative or reshape it entirely.

Be part of #Content360 Malaysia, 13 May 2026, where creativity and community collide. Explore how AI-powered imagination, culturally resonant storytelling, and platform-savvy strategies are shaping the future of content. Gain practical insights, discover new tactics, and learn how the region’s top creators and brands are crafting campaigns that truly resonate.

Related articles: 
Cheers and criticism: Angie Cheong’s Perak ambassadorship has netizens split 
When real-world mechanics meet real-world pain in OATSIDE's 'CMO' campaign 
Why marketers might be missing out banking only on big festive moments